The Train is Derailed

1 September 2007

ncf_a_carr_275.jpg

Michigan suffered the worst loss in the history of its storied program, and perhaps in College Football in general, losing 34-32 to two-time defending I-AA champions Appalachian St. at home on Saturday. Since 1978 (with the split into division I-A and I-AA), no ranked I-A team has ever lost to a I-AA team. The Wolverines were ranked #5 in the Pre-season Poll, but will almost certainly be ejected from the Top 25 when the polls come out on Monday. Sportswriters around the country will be scrambling for a parallel. There isn’t one.

First, why does Michigan schedule this game? There is no way that that game helps Michigan. They could have won the game 63-0, and it wouldn’t have reflected on them positively because it was “only a I-AA team.” It didn’t attract interest as Appalachian St. are a small school (the game was not even televised locally). It would have been viewed as fluff and discounted by the BCS and voters. So basically the school risked an absolute catastrophe if they lost, for no net gain.

Second, the coaching staff needs to take the blame. There were the obvious decision-making blunders, going for and missing the two-point conversions. The defense got picked apart, giving up big play after big play in a performance that was absolutely atrocious. How many times in the last decade has Michigan been made to look silly by a mobile quarterback? There is also no excuse for a team not being able to block on a field goal try late in the game. It didn’t come down to mistakes, turnovers, and lack of execution. The players were out-played, and, more importantly, the coaches were out-coached.

This could be the darkest hour of Michigan’s history, and maybe that is a good thing. Had they escaped with a win, the problems would have been glossed over and written off as a bad day. This happened with similar poor beginning of the season performances, a 24-21 needlessly dramatic win over might San Diego St. comes to mind.

The loss exposes for all to see the underlying problems in the program. The reliance on talent and physical dominance, over creativity and game-specific planning. The parade of 6 foot 6 strong-armed but immobile white quarterbacks. The inability to correctly utilize unconventionally talented players (athletic black player = wideout). The emphasis upon size rather than mobility for offensive linemen. The tendency to play down to the level of the opposition.  The tendency to come out flat in big games.  It all gets aired out in the open now, rather than get thrust under the carpet as the ramblings of an irrational and spoiled fan base.

For 40 years, the football program has been run by Bo or one of his scions, who have prided themselves on doing things “the Michigan way.”  But what happens when the Michigan way doesn’t work anymore?  What happens when the players stop responding?  Bo’s passing was unfortunate, but may also be symbolic.  Great College Football programs don’t reflect on past numbers and titles, they win games.  Michigan is not just another football program, but without the injection of some new blood it is fast on the way to becoming one.

The Wolverines now face a choice.  Their national title aspirations are over.  They are in the wost possible position, but they still have 11 more games to play.  They can roll over and die after the traumatic defeat, like most would expect.  Or the Henne-Hart-Long axis, that has long discussed the “unfinished business,” can man up and take care of it.  They can sulk and crawl into a turtle shell when the national media rips them this week, or they can use it as motivation, and regain the edge that they have long lacked under Carr.

A successful season at Michigan comprises two things, winning the Big Ten and beating Ohio State, and not necessarily in that order.  Those two things are still within reach.


Michigan and Notre Dame Got it Right

31 July 2007

nddn21.jpg

Despite speculation that both teams would let the agreement lapse in 2011, Michigan and Notre Dame have agreed on a new contract to continue their annual rivalry a further 20 years, until the 2031 season.  Michigan and Notre Dame are College Football’s two winningest, and perhaps most iconic programs.  Though they only met twice between 1909-1977, the already existent regional rivalry has helped intensify the game on the gridiron, which has occurred 23 times in the past 29 seasons.  Michigan leads the all-time series 19-14-1.

This was a brilliant move by both universities.  For both schools, this is a game that fans and alumni circle on the calendar.  There is an enormous amount of bad blood accross the board from football to academics.  Their massive fanbases overlap (much more than Michigan-Ohio St.), and each considers the other to be the epitome of arrogance.  It has an absolutely electric atmosphere.

Both schools have had rivalries fall by the wayside, such as those epic Notre Dame battles against Army and Navy and Michigan’s domination of The Little Brown Jug.  This game largely fills that gap for both schools.

It has all the qualities of a great rivalry.  The game is almost always close, no matter what the disparity on paper between the teams.  You can trace back the epic moments (see Desmond Howard) over the past 30 seasons.   It is just a great game.

Perhaps, the final reason is this.  They have played eachother almost non-stop for the past 30 years.  It doesn’t have the numbers of the other rivalries, but for an entire generation of fans at both schools it has become tradition.


Trade-In Tommy

4 March 2007

amaker-for-ncaak1.jpg

This will undoubtedly sound like sour grapes and being overly critical after a tough loss to the #1 team in the Country. However, it needs to be said. Tommy Amaker should be fired.

He has undoubtedly cleaned up the image of Michigan’s program, which had been riddled with ethical problems born through the excess of previous administrations. However, for a top college basketball program to be successful, there has to be a balance between behaving according to principle and winning.

Amaker arose out of the Duke school of winning the right way (or the white way). Under the system Mike Krzyzewski created, players played tough defense and fundamental basketball. They produced great character guys who were leaders and stayed all four years. Players like Amaker, who were not necessarily gifted or NBA caliber flourished.

However, the game has changed since the 1980’s. In order to compete for the top talent, you need to accept that players are going to leave early, and that they have ambitions beyond the university. You can’t lose out on top recruits due to archaic rules from a bygone era, like not guranteeing a freshman a starting spot.

Philosophical reasons aside, his performance as a head coach has been decidedly mediocre. His four year reign “turning around” Seton Hall did include a Sweet 16 run in 2000, but also included three .500 seasons. In his five previous seasons, Michigan has won the NIT in 2004 and made the NIT final in 2006. Yet, they have also suffered through two losing seasons and never qualified for the NCAA Tournament. Though a respectable 20-10 so far this season, only a miraculous Big Ten Tournament performance would get the team into the big dance.

The teams’ results have not been due to lack of talent. Amaker has brought in top 20 recuriting classes. 2002’s class brought in players like Daniel Horton and Lester Abram. 2003 brought in Michigan Mr. Basketball Deon Harris, Courtney Sims, and Brent Petway.

The results have, however, been due to horrific collapses and mental indiscipline. The team has suffered numerous defeats, such as Saturday’s to Ohio State where they had a team in their clutches but could not maintain composure. They gave up ten unanswered points at the end, punctuated by a botched dunk by Sims and a missed free throw by Harris that were inexcusable. In 2006 the team started 16-3, yet collapsed down the stretch to finish 19-10 and not make the tournament.

I will also question why the team always plays a 2-3 zone, even if the other team has 4 guys who can nail 3pt shots, and the team appears to run no coherent offensive strategy other than a pick and roll on the baseline with Brent Petway who is useless when he is not within 3 feet of the basket.

The bottom line is that Amaker has had 6 years to turn around the program. He has had two years of having a team entirely of his own players. He has had four years without NCAA sanctions. Instead of getting better, the Michigan basketball team has been consistently underperforming and mediocre. Though according to all accounts he is a decent guy, there are many mid-major coaches who would salivate at the opportunity to coach where they could recruit and build a title winning program. Michigan should look to one of them.